By using this site, you agree to the Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Accept

Your #1 guide to start a business and grow it the right way…

  • Home
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
    • Business Plans
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • More
    • Tax Preparation
    • Leadership
    • Marketing
Subscribe
Aa
BrandiaryBrandiary
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • Leadership
  • Marketing
  • Tax Preparation
Search
  • Home
  • Startups
  • Start A Business
    • Business Plans
    • Branding
    • Business Ideas
    • Business Models
    • Fundraising
  • Growing a Business
  • Funding
  • More
    • Tax Preparation
    • Leadership
    • Marketing
Made by ThemeRuby using the Foxiz theme Powered by WordPress
Brandiary > Startups > OpenAI’s Long-Term AI Risk Team Has Disbanded

OpenAI’s Long-Term AI Risk Team Has Disbanded

News Room By News Room May 20, 2024 4 Min Read
Share

In July last year, OpenAI announced the formation of a new research team that would prepare for the advent of supersmart artificial intelligence capable of outwitting and overpowering its creators. Ilya Sutskever, OpenAI’s chief scientist and one of the company’s cofounders, was named as the colead of this new team. OpenAI said the team would receive 20 percent of its computing power.

Now OpenAI’s “superalignment team” is no more, the company confirms. That comes after the departures of several researchers involved, Tuesday’s news that Sutskever was leaving the company, and the resignation of the team’s other colead. The group’s work will be absorbed into OpenAI’s other research efforts.

Sutskever’s departure made headlines because although he’d helped CEO Sam Altman start OpenAI in 2015 and set the direction of the research that led to ChatGPT, he was also one of the four board members who fired Altman in November. Altman was restored as CEO five chaotic days later after a mass revolt by OpenAI staff and the brokering of a deal in which Sutskever and two other company directors left the board.

Hours after Sutskever’s departure was announced on Tuesday, Jan Leike, the former DeepMind researcher who was the superalignment team’s other colead, posted on X that he had resigned.

Neither Sutskever nor Leike responded to requests for comment. Sutskever did not offer an explanation for his decision to leave but offered support for OpenAI’s current path in a post on X. “The company’s trajectory has been nothing short of miraculous, and I’m confident that OpenAI will build AGI that is both safe and beneficial” under its current leadership, he wrote.

Leike posted a thread on X on Friday explaining that his decision came from a disagreement over the company’s priorities and how much resources his team was being allocated.

“I have been disagreeing with OpenAI leadership about the company’s core priorities for quite some time, until we finally reached a breaking point,” Leike wrote. “Over the past few months my team has been sailing against the wind. Sometimes we were struggling for compute and it was getting harder and harder to get this crucial research done.”

The dissolution of OpenAI’s superalignment team adds to recent evidence of a shakeout inside the company in the wake of last November’s governance crisis. Two researchers on the team, Leopold Aschenbrenner and Pavel Izmailov, were dismissed for leaking company secrets, The Information reported last month. Another member of the team, William Saunders, left OpenAI in February, according to an internet forum post in his name.

Two more OpenAI researchers working on AI policy and governance also appear to have left the company recently. Cullen O’Keefe left his role as research lead on policy frontiers in April, according to LinkedIn. Daniel Kokotajlo, an OpenAI researcher who has coauthored several papers on the dangers of more capable AI models, “quit OpenAI due to losing confidence that it would behave responsibly around the time of AGI,” according to a posting on an internet forum in his name. None of the researchers who have apparently left responded to requests for comment.



Read the full article here

News Room May 20, 2024 May 20, 2024
Share This Article
Facebook Twitter Copy Link Print
Previous Article How to Break Free From the Corporate Grind to Pursue Your Passion
Next Article Like it or not, the age of the employee social ambassador is here
Leave a comment Leave a comment

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Wake up with our popular morning roundup of the day's top startup and business stories

Stay Updated

Get the latest headlines, discounts for the military community, and guides to maximizing your benefits
Subscribe

Top Picks

Netflix buys Warner Bros. Discovery in deal valued at $83 billion
December 6, 2025
Spotify Wrapped is for advertisers, too
December 5, 2025
Ruby Is Not a Serious Programming Language
December 5, 2025
What’s happening with social media bans?
December 4, 2025
The Rare Earth Metal Driving Tensions Between the US and China
December 4, 2025

You Might Also Like

Ruby Is Not a Serious Programming Language

Startups

The Rare Earth Metal Driving Tensions Between the US and China

Startups

Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers to Build Its Surveillance AI

Startups

Sam Bankman-Fried Goes on the Offensive

Startups

© 2023 Brandiary. All Rights Reserved.

Helpful Links

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Press Release
  • Advertise
  • Contact

Resources

  • Start A Business
  • Funding
  • Growing a Business
  • Leadership
  • Marketing

Popuplar

Why Cinemark is testing an industry-first brand campaign
Flock Uses Overseas Gig Workers to Build Its Surveillance AI
Blended and branded: The business behind Erewhon smoothie collabs

We provide daily business and startup news, benefits information, and how to grow your small business, follow us now to get the news that matters to you.

Welcome Back!

Sign in to your account

Lost your password?