Founder and CEO of Global Squirrels, a complete SaaS platform for international remote hiring and payroll management.
The misclassification of workers—a practice where employees are erroneously labeled as contractors—can lead to grave consequences for both companies and workers alike.
In 2015, FedEx settled a lawsuit for $228 million to resolve claims from drivers in California who argued they were misclassified as independent contractors. This settlement included compensation for unpaid overtime, expenses and other benefits that would have been owed to employees under the law. In 2016, they reached another settlement of $240 million in a class-action lawsuit involving drivers in 20 other states.
These examples highlight the need for companies to carefully evaluate their working relationships and ensure compliance with labor laws to avoid costly legal battles and penalties.
Having delved deep into the intricacies of global hiring and payroll services for over a decade, I’ve witnessed firsthand the challenges of employment classifications. My journey through the HR and legal sectors has not only equipped me with the expertise but also fueled my passion for championing transparent and fair employment practices.
The Significance Of Precise Worker Classification
Accurate worker classification is not a mere technicality; it holds profound legal and financial implications. Employees are entitled to various rights and benefits under employment laws, such as minimum wage, overtime pay, workers’ compensation and protection from discrimination. On the other hand, independent contractors typically do not enjoy these same benefits.
The consequences of worker misclassification are far-reaching. Companies may face lawsuits demanding unpaid wages, taxes and benefits. Government agencies can impose fines and penalties for failing to meet tax obligations and labor regulations. Such cases can tarnish a company’s reputation, disrupt operations and drain valuable resources that could have been invested elsewhere.
Unintentional Misclassification
Misclassification is often unintentional and can arise due to a misunderstanding of the criteria that determine a worker’s status.
Companies might misclassify workers if they focus solely on the nature of the work being performed rather than considering factors like control, independence and integration. For instance, if a company exerts a significant degree of control over how, when and where a worker performs their tasks, it might indicate an employer-employee relationship rather than a contractor-client arrangement.
For example, let’s say Example Studios (ES)—a company specializing in content creation—brings on board Alex, a video editor, as an independent contractor for a specific project. Alex enjoys the flexibility of working remotely, setting his own schedule and using his personal editing equipment. ES compensates Alex with a lump sum for the project, and as it’s a short-term collaboration, they don’t provide benefits.
ES is impressed with Alex and decides to collaborate again. This time, they provide comprehensive guidelines and a clear deadline for the project. While Alex still maintains his remote setup and personal equipment, he senses a bit more oversight from ES to meet their vision.
As months pass, Alex becomes a frequent collaborator on ES projects, becoming their go-to editor. Although he still operates from his own workspace and uses his own tools, he’s predominantly working for ES and doesn’t take on other clients. Eventually, Alex realizes he’s been an essential part of ES for a substantial period without being classified as an employee.
ES might have unintentionally misclassified Alex as an independent contractor. Initially, this classification was fitting, but as the collaboration became more consistent and Alex felt more guided by ES, the situation evolved. If Alex were to question his classification, a legal standpoint might suggest he should have been considered an employee and granted benefits.
For ES, this situation could lead to a range of repercussions, like owing retroactive payments or investigation by regulatory bodies. If they find other contractors at ES were also wrongly classified, the consequences could multiply. Moreover, ES’s reputation might suffer—affecting their ability to attract skilled professionals in the future.
General Classification Criteria
While the exact criteria may vary based on legal regulations and jurisdiction, here are some general factors for companies to consider.
• Control.
• Independence.
• Nature of work.
• Supervision.
• Tools and equipment.
• Risk and profit/loss.
• Duration of engagement.
• Exclusive or multiple clients.
• Integration.
• Contracts and agreements.
• Benefits and perks.
It’s important to note that no single factor is determinative, and the entire working relationship should be considered in context.
Safeguarding Worker Classification
Here are some ways companies can steer clear of the pitfalls of misclassification.
1. Regular Assessments And Audits
Conduct a detailed assessment of working relationships and independent contractor agreements. Start by reviewing the nature of the work, the level of control the employer has over the worker and the financial arrangements in place. Key questions to consider include:
• Is the worker performing core business functions?
• Do they supply their own tools and resources?
• How permanent is the relationship?
It’s advisable to conduct these assessments annually or whenever there’s a significant change in the working relationship to ensure compliance with labor laws and avoid potential legal pitfalls.
2. Working With Experts
Consider consultation with legal and HR professionals or the engagement of professional employer organizations (PEOs) or employer of record (EOR) services. (Disclosure: My company offers these services, as do others.) When working with these professionals, clear and open communication is paramount.
Treat these experts as partners, articulating business needs and regularly checking in for updates. To maximize the relationship, embrace offered training sessions and resources, enhancing internal expertise.
Challenges might arise from differing opinions or integration of new systems; it’s essential to understand the rationale behind their advice, consider a second opinion if needed, and adopt a phased approach to streamline integration. Balancing the initial investment with the long-term benefits of compliance can help employers see the value in these professional relationships.
3. Training
For successful training, I suggest offering interactive sessions with real-life scenarios and ensuring materials are updated with evolving guidelines. Incorporating a feedback mechanism can address concerns and clarify doubts, while active leadership participation underscores the importance of compliance.
Leveraging technology, like e-learning platforms, can further enhance training effectiveness. Business leaders should approach these trainings as a means to cultivate a culture of transparency and responsibility—beyond just meeting compliance standards.
The accurate classification of workers is a significant concern for businesses of all sizes. But, by taking a holistic approach, companies can effectively deal with the complexities of worker classification.
The information provided here is not legal advice and does not purport to be a substitute for advice of counsel on any specific matter. For legal advice, you should consult with an attorney concerning your specific situation.
Forbes Business Council is the foremost growth and networking organization for business owners and leaders. Do I qualify?
Read the full article here
